T4E TP50 Gen 2 CO2 Pistol

Brand: T4E
Model: T4E TP50 Gen 2
Caliber: .50
Power Source: 12g CO2 (quick piercing system)
Action: Semi-auto, double-action trigger
Magazine Capacity: 6 rounds (internal inline magazine)
Construction: Polymer frame and slide with metal internals and barrel
Safety: Integrated trigger safety
Energy: 7.5 Joules
Velocity: 465 FPS
Overall Length: ~8 inches
Barrel Length: ~4 inches
Weight: 24.05 oz
Material: Polymer
Rail Type: 22 mm Picatinny
Front Sight: Yes (Fibre Optic)
Rear Sight: Yes
Number of Rails: 1
Safety: Yes (1)
Ammunition Type: .50 caliber round balls

T4E TP50 Gen 2 CO2 Pistol delivers enhanced performance with 7.5 Joules of power and improved ergonomics for better handling and control.

Featuring a fibre optic front sight for faster target acquisition and a Quick-Piercing CO2 system for instant readiness, this .50 caliber pistol offers durable polymer construction, a 6-round capacity, and compatibility with multiple projectile types for versatile use.

Buy the CO2: NSS1000-0001
Buy the Ammo: Nylon Balls, Rubber Balls

Pros:

• 7.5 Joules kinetic energy output.
• Fibre optic front sight for fast target acquisition.
• Quick-Piercing CO2 system.
• Durable reinforced polymer construction.
• 6-round capacity cylinder.
• Compatible with multiple .50 caliber projectiles.
• 22 mm Picatinny rail for accessories.
• Compatible with multiple ammo types, including rubber, steel-rubber, paintballs and more.
• Fiber optic sights make target acquisition easy in various lighting condition.
• Textured grip and slide for solid handling.
• Metal trigger with integrated safety.
• Strong power output for its category.
• Fast CO2 activation system.
• Improved ergonomic grip.
• Versatile projectile compatibility.
• Accessory rail support.

Cons:

• Only 6-round capacity before reload.
• Limited shots per CO2 (~3–4 reloads).
• Internal magazine (no quick mag swaps).

Read the full review in our blog:
Umarex T4E TP50 Gen 2 CO2 Paintball Pistol Table Top Review

Umarex T4E TP50 Gen 2 CO2 Paintball Pistol Field Test Review